A deep comparison of two forex giants. Exness stands out for automation, flexibility, unlimited leverage, and instant withdrawals, while IC Markets is built around raw pricing, institutional-grade execution, and a more traditional professional trading environment.
Strong for instant withdrawals, high leverage, mobile simplicity, and gold traders.
Better fit for scalpers, algo traders, cTrader users, and traders who prioritize raw spreads.

Exness is the titan of liquidity and technology-driven flexibility, while IC Markets is the gold standard for raw pricing and algorithmic execution. This guide provides a deep-dive analysis into their regulations, fee structures, platform technology, and specialized trading conditions to help you decide which powerhouse aligns with your strategy.
Click to read the full Exness Broker Review.
Click to read the full IC Markets Broker Review.
ASIC
CySEC
FSA
FCA
CySEC
FSCA
FSA| Symbol | Exness | IC Markets | Best |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 0.8 pips | 0.1 pips | IC Markets |
| GBP/USD | 1.0 pips | 0.12 pips | IC Markets |
| USD/JPY | 1.1 pips | 0.2 pips | IC Markets |
| AUD/USD | 0.9 pips | 0.2 pips | IC Markets |
| XAU/USD | 25 pips | 0.1 pips | IC Markets |
Quick answers to the most common questions traders ask when comparing Exness and IC Markets on spreads, execution, platforms, and overall trading experience.
IC Markets is usually the stronger choice for scalping because it combines tighter raw spreads, deep liquidity, and very low latency conditions.
Best for scalping: IC Markets
On most major forex pairs, IC Markets tends to offer lower spreads overall, especially on raw-style pricing. Exness can still be competitive on selected instruments, but IC Markets usually has the edge for spread-sensitive traders.
Lower spreads: IC Markets
Both brokers are fast, but the comparison data shows Exness with a slightly better average execution speed, while IC Markets performs better on minimum latency metrics.
Average speed: Exness Min latency: IC Markets
Based on the slippage figures in this comparison, Exness shows better average slippage and a slightly better maximum slippage profile. That can make Exness more appealing for traders who closely watch fill quality.
Better slippage: Exness
Exness is often more beginner-friendly because of its smoother onboarding, simpler interface, and stronger retail-focused user experience.
Best for beginners: Exness
IC Markets is generally the better fit for advanced and professional traders, especially for scalping, algorithmic trading, and cTrader-based workflows.
Best for pros: IC Markets
Yes. Both brokers support MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. However, IC Markets also supports cTrader, which gives it an advantage for traders who want more platform flexibility.
It depends on what you want. Exness offers a smoother proprietary and retail-oriented experience, while IC Markets wins on third-party platform breadth with MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradingView support.
Better UX: Exness More platform depth: IC Markets
Choose IC Markets if your priority is tight spreads, low-latency execution, and advanced trading tools. Choose Exness if your priority is ease of use, smoother retail execution, and a more beginner-friendly experience.
For scalpers & pros: IC Markets For beginners & ease of use: Exness

Emma Thompson

Robert Walker
Top Trusted Brokers

Your Capital is at Risk

Your capital is at risk

75.9% of retail CFD accounts lose money

Your capital is at risk

Your capital is at risk

Your capital is at risk

75.18% of retail CFD accounts lose money

71.2% of retail CFD accounts lose money

75.7% of retail investors lose money

69.3% of retail CFD accounts lose money
Have you used this broker? Share your experience and help other traders make smarter decisions.
No user reviews yet. Be the first to rate this broker.